A web-based tool designed to help non-technical users create optimized prompts for coding agents. The tool bridges the gap between user intent and effective AI communication by providing structured templates, progressive guidance, and real-time prompt quality scoring to improve development outcomes when working with AI coding assistants.
Goal: Create an intuitive tool that generates coding agent-optimized prompts without requiring technical expertise, making AI development tools more accessible and reducing development time by eliminating endless error loops.
As a UX designer working with coding agents, I repeatedly encountered a frustrating cycle: I could clearly envision the user experience and application flow I wanted to build, but struggled to communicate my vision effectively to AI coding tools. This communication gap led to endless error loops, bug fixes, and applications that never quite matched my original intent.
Non-technical users struggle to translate UX design thinking into prompts that coding agents can execute successfully. The gap between human intent and AI interpretation creates friction and failed development attempts.
Inadequate prompts lead to applications that require constant bug fixes and never match the original vision. Hours are wasted debugging issues that stem from poor initial prompt construction.
Users don't know what information coding agents need to succeed. Critical context, technical constraints, and success criteria are often omitted, dooming projects from the start.
The blank prompt box creates anxiety and uncertainty. Non-technical creators don't know where to start or how to structure their requests for optimal results.
Why it mattered: The core challenge was translating UX design thinking into prompts that coding agents could execute successfully—a skill gap that many non-technical creators face when trying to leverage AI development tools. This barrier prevents talented designers and creators from fully utilizing powerful AI coding assistants.
Rather than conducting formal user research, I leveraged direct observation and documentation of my own workflow challenges when interacting with coding agents. The goal was to build fast, test immediately, and iterate based on real-world usage—moving from concept to deployed product in just 2 hours.
I catalogued specific pain points from my own workflow: where I got stuck, which prompts failed, and what information the agents needed but I hadn't provided. Additionally, I observed colleagues facing similar struggles and noted common patterns in their difficulties.
The design approach centered on a core principle: meet users where they are in their mental model. Rather than forcing users to learn prompt engineering theory, I designed the tool to feel like a natural conversation starter. The key insight was to use scenario-based templates as entry points.
Built as a single-page React application using TypeScript for type safety and maintainability. Leveraged Vite for rapid development and optimized build performance. The architecture prioritizes component reusability and clean separation between template logic, prompt generation algorithms, and UI presentation.
Validation occurred through immediate dogfooding—I used the tool for my own coding agent interactions and measured whether it reduced my development friction. The prompt quality scoring feature provided real-time feedback during creation, allowing iterative refinement.
The tool transforms complex prompt engineering into an intuitive, guided experience. By providing structured templates, progressive disclosure, and real-time quality scoring, it enables non-technical users to generate optimized prompts without needing to understand the underlying theory.
Pre-built starting points that match common use cases, eliminating the blank canvas problem.
Step-by-step guidance that reveals complexity only when users are ready for it.
Real-time calculator that evaluates prompt completeness and provides instant feedback.
Guidance that surfaces prompt engineering insights at the moment they're needed.
Pre-built starting points that match common use cases (landing pages, dashboards, APIs, etc.), eliminating the blank canvas problem and helping users begin with confidence. Users can select a template matching their intent rather than facing an intimidating empty text box.
Step-by-step guidance that reveals information fields incrementally, preventing cognitive overload while ensuring all necessary prompt components are captured. The interface guides users through a familiar pattern: "What are you trying to build? Tell me more about it."
Real-time calculator that evaluates prompt completeness and optimization, providing instant feedback and encouraging users to strengthen weak areas before generating final output. The scoring creates positive reinforcement—users can see their score improve as they add more detail.
Contextual guidance that surfaces prompt engineering insights at the moment they're needed, educating users without requiring them to study documentation. Tips appear contextually, explaining "why" without interrupting flow, gradually building user mental models.
Structured prompt formatting specifically designed for coding agent comprehension, translating user input into the technical detail and context that AI tools need to succeed. The output includes clear context, specific requirements, technical constraints, and desired outcomes.
React with TypeScript for type-safe component development
Tailwind CSS for consistent, responsive design across devices
Vite for rapid development, Vercel for instant deployment
Design Impact: By focusing on UX principles rather than technical complexity, the design makes powerful AI tools accessible to a broader audience. The structured approach increases confidence when interacting with coding agents, removing the anxiety of "not knowing what to say."
The tool achieved its core mission: transforming how non-technical users interact with coding agents by reducing development friction and building confidence through structured guidance.
Transformed hours of debugging into productive creation time
Applications matched original vision without error loops
Rapid validation through immediate dogfooding
Actively used and continuously improving
Bottom Line: The tool addresses a growing need as AI coding assistants become more prevalent: helping non-technical creators bridge the communication gap between human intent and machine execution. By focusing on UX principles rather than technical complexity, the design makes powerful AI tools accessible to a broader audience.
Complex technical processes can be made accessible through thoughtful UX design that meets users in their existing mental models rather than forcing paradigm shifts. By designing the experience to feel natural and approachable, using scenario templates as intuitive entry points, the tool removes intimidation factors and builds confidence incrementally.
Sometimes the fastest path to validating a tool is building it quickly and dogfooding it immediately—2 hours from concept to deployed product proved sufficient for a meaningful solution. When the problem is clearly defined and the solution is tightly scoped, meaningful tools don't always require extensive development cycles.
Breaking complex tasks into sequential steps with contextual guidance prevents overwhelm while ensuring completeness, a pattern applicable across many design challenges. The interface mirrors conversational patterns users already understand, revealing complexity only as needed and building confidence through clear feedback loops.
Real-time scoring and tips create positive reinforcement that educates users while they work, building capability alongside task completion. The prompt quality scoring feature provides transparent feedback—users can see their score improve as they add more detail, creating positive reinforcement and gradually building user mental models.
This project exemplifies the "designer as builder" approach—identifying a personal pain point, rapidly prototyping a solution, and immediately validating through real-world use. The 2-hour timeframe from concept to deployment demonstrates that meaningful tools don't always require extensive development cycles when the problem is clearly defined and the solution is tightly scoped.
This project demonstrates how identifying personal friction points and rapidly building solutions can create tools with broader impact. By treating design as a way to democratize access to powerful technology, we can help more people leverage AI coding assistants effectively.